Discourse Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here for free online access to SAGE language and linguistics journals

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ANTAKI, C.
Right arrow Articles by WETHERELL, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Discourse Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1, 7-27 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/1461445699001001002

Show Concessions

CHARLES ANTAKI

LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY

MARGARET WETHERELL

OPEN UNIVERSITY

Making a show of conceding by using a three-part structure of proposition, concession and reassertion has the effect - in contrast to other ways of conceding - of strengthening one's own position at the expense of a counter-argument. This three-part structure can be also exploited so as to carry the battle to the enemy, as it were, and make the concession do more offensive work. We detail three such ways: Trojan Horses where the speaker imports a caricature of the opposition into the conceded material; stings in the tail, where the speaker specifically overturns the concession they have just made in the original claim; and cheapeners, where the speaker works pragmatically to devalue even a positive endorsement of the opposition's case. In all their variety, what marks the concession as being hearably in the speaker's own interest is the robust, normative three-part proposition - concession - reprise structure. It is available for use in supporting or demeaning any position, whether mundane or explicitly ideological.

Key Words: arguments • concession • conversation analysis • discursive psychology • extreme case formulation • impossible descriptions • rhetoric • stake and interest


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Discourse SocietyHome page
C. Tileaga
What is a `revolution'?: National commemoration, collective memory and managing authenticity in the representation of a political event
Discourse Society, May 1, 2008; 19(3): 359 - 382.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Men and MasculinitiesHome page
N. Korobov
The Management of "Nonrelational Sexuality": Positioning Strategies in Adolescent Male Talk about (Hetero)Sexual Attraction
Men and Masculinities, April 1, 2006; 8(4): 493 - 517.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Discourse SocietyHome page
C. Tileaga
Accounting for extreme prejudice and legitimating blame in talk about the Romanies
Discourse Society, September 1, 2005; 16(5): 603 - 624.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Discourse StudiesHome page
D. Edwards
Moaning, whinging and laughing: the subjective side of complaints
Discourse Studies, February 1, 2005; 7(1): 5 - 29.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health (London)Home page
F. L. Bishop and L. Yardley
Constructing Agency in Treatment Decisions: Negotiating Responsibility in Cancer
Health (London) , October 1, 2004; 8(4): 465 - 482.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health (London)Home page
O. Jolanki
Moral Argumentation in Talk about Health and Old Age
Health (London) , October 1, 2004; 8(4): 483 - 503.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Feminism PsychologyHome page
S. A. Speer
Reconsidering the Concept of Hegemonic Masculinity: Discursive Psychology, Conversation Analysis and Participants' Orientations
Feminism Psychology, February 1, 2001; 11(1): 107 - 135.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Discourse SocietyHome page
S. A. SPEER and J. POTTER
The Management of Heterosexist Talk: Conversational Resources and Prejudiced Claims
Discourse Society, October 1, 2000; 11(4): 543 - 572.
[Abstract] [PDF]