Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Discourse Studies
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bucholtz, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Variation in transcription

Mary Bucholtz

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA, USA, bucholtz{at}linguistics.ucsb.edu

The entextualization and recontextualization of speech via transcription is a fundamental methodology of discourse analysis. However, particularly for researchers concerned with sociopolitical issues in discourse, transcription is not a straightforward tool but a highly problematic yet necessary form of linguistic representation. Recent commentators have critiqued the inconsistency of researcher transcripts; by contrast, this article seeks to understand rather than remedy such variability, conceptualizing diversity in transcripts as a kind of linguistic variation. Examining four different types of variation in transcription practice — global format choices based on an analytic focus on content versus form, variation in the details of transcription format in reproducing one's own or others' transcripts, orthographic variation in a single transcript, and variation in translation — the article argues that although reflection about the transcription process cannot overcome the difficulties inherent in this methodology, it can allow scholars to be more attentive to their own transcription choices and their limitations and to make these explicit in their writing.

Key Words: entextualization • linguistic representation • methodology • orthography • reflexivity • translation

References

  • Ashmore, M., MacMillan, K. and Brown, S.D. (2004) ` It's a Scream: Professional Hearing and Tape Fetishism', Journal of Pragmatics 36(2): 349—74.[CrossRef]
  • Ashmore, M. and Reed, D. (2000) ` Innocence and Nostalgia in Conversation Analysis: The Dynamic Relations of Tape and Transcript ', Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/ Forum: Qualitative Social Research 1(3), available online at: [ http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/3—00/3—00ashmorereed-e.htm ].
  • Bailey, C.-J.N. (1986) ` Even Dialectologists Get the Blues: Inadequate Phonetic Transcription of English ', Papiere zur Linguistik 35(2): 3—38.
  • Bailey, G., Tillery, J. and Andres, C. (2005) ` Some Effects of Transcribers on Data in Dialectology ', American Speech 80(1): 3—21.[Abstract]
  • Bakhtin, M.M. (1981) The Dialogic Imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  • Bakhtin, M.M. (1984) Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Bauman, R. and Briggs, C.L. (1990) ` Poetics and Performance as Critical Perspectives on Language and Social Life ', Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 59—88.[Web of Science]
  • Briggs, C.L. and Bauman, R. (1992) ` Genre, Intertextuality, and Social Power ', Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 2(2): 131—72.[CrossRef]
  • Bucholtz, M. (1995) `Language in Evidence: The Pragmatics of Translation and the Judicial Process', in M. Morris (ed.) Translation and the Law, pp. 115—29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Bucholtz, M. (1998) ` Geek the Girl: Language, Femininity, and Female Nerds ', in N. Warner et al. (eds) Gender and Belief Systems : Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Women and Language Conference, pp. 119—31. Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group.
  • Bucholtz, M. (1999a) `" Why Be Normal?": Language and Identity Practices in a Community of Nerd Girls ', Language in Society 28(2): 203—23.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Bucholtz, M. (1999b) ` You Da Man: Narrating the Racial Other in the Linguistic Production of White Masculinity ', Journal of Sociolinguistics 3(4): 443—60.[CrossRef]
  • Bucholtz, M. (2000) ` The Politics of Transcription', Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1439—65.[CrossRef]
  • Bucholtz, M. (2001) ` Reflexivity and Critique in Discourse Analysis ', Critique of Anthropology 21(1): 157—75.
  • Bucholtz, M. (in preparation) Styling: Language and White Youth Cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bucholtz, M. and Hall, K. (2005) ` Identity and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach ', Discourse Studies 7(4—5): 585—614.[Abstract]
  • Coupland, N. (1980) ` Style-shifting in a Cardiff Work-setting ', Language in Society 9(1): 1—12.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Coupland, N. (1985) `" Hark, Hark, the Lark": Social Motivations for Phonological Styleshifting ', Language and Communication 5(3): 153—71.[CrossRef]
  • Du Bois, J.W. (2003) `Discourse and Grammar', in M. Tomasello (ed.) The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, Vol. 2, pp. 47—87. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Du Bois, J.W., Chafe, W.L., Meyer, C. and Thompson, S.A. (2000) Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part 1. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.
  • Eckert, P. and Rickford, J.R. (eds) (2001) Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Edwards, J.A. and Lampert, M.D. (eds) (1993) Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Ferber, R. (1991) ` Slip of the Tongue or Slip of the Ear? On the Perception and Transcription of Naturalistic Slips of the Tongue ', Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 20(2): 105—22.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Fine, E.C. (1984) The Folklore Text: From Performance to Print. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Flewitt, R. (2006) ` Using Video to Investigate Preschool Classroom Interaction: Education Research Assumptions and Methodological Practices', Visual Communication 5(1): 25—50.
  • Goodwin, C. (1994) ` Professional Vision ', American Anthropologist 96(3): 606—33.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Gumperz, J.J. and Berenz, N. (1993) `Transcribing Conversational Exchanges', in J.A. Edwards and M.D. Lampert (eds) Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research, pp. 91—121. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Haviland, J.B. (1996) `Text from Talk in Tzotzil', in M. Silverstein and G. Urban (eds) Natural Histories of Discourse, pp. 45—78. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Hymes, D. (1981) `In Vain I Tried to Tell You': Essays in Native American Ethnopoetics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Hymes, D. (1996) `Ethnopoetics and Sociolinguistics: Three Stories by African-American Children', in Ethnography, Linguistics, Narrative Inequality: Toward an Understanding of Voice, pp. 165—83. Bristol, PA: Taylor and Francis.
  • Jaffe, A. (ed.) (2000) ` Non-standard Orthography and Non-standard Speech ', Journal of Sociolinguistics 4(4) (Special issue).
  • Jefferson, G. (1978) ` What's in a ``Nyem''? ', Sociology 12(1): 135—9.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Jefferson, G. (1983) ` Issues in the Transcription of Naturally-occurring Talk: Caricature vs. Capturing Pronunciational Particulars', Tilburg Papers in Language and Literature 34.
  • Jefferson, G. (1985) `An Exercise in the Transcription and Analysis of Laughter', in T.A. van Dijk (ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Vol. 3, pp. 25—34. London: Academic Press.
  • Jefferson, G. (2004) `Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction ', in G.H. Lerner (ed.) Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, pp. 13—31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Kelly, J. and Local, J.K. (1989) `On the Use of General Phonetic Techniques in Handling Conversational Material', in D. Roger and P. Bull (eds) Conversation: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, pp. 197—212. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • Kerswill, P. and Wright, S. (1990) ` The Validity of Phonetic Transcription: Limitations of a Sociolinguistic Research Tool ', Language Variation and Change 2(3): 255—75. Kiesling, S.F. (2004) ` Dude ', American Speech 79(3): 281—305.[Abstract]
  • Kitzinger, C. (1998) ` Inaccuracies in Quoting from Data Transcripts: Or Inaccuracy in Quotations from Data Transcripts ', Discourse & Society 9: 136—43.[CrossRef]
  • Labov, W. (1972) `The Social Stratification of (r) in New York City ', in Sociolinguistic Patterns, pp. 43—69. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Lane, L.-A., Denton, J. and Suslak, D. (1996) ` The Validity and Reliability of Phonetic Transcriptions in Sociolinguistics and Dialectology ', in R. Ide, R. Parker and Y. Sunaoshi (eds) SALSA 3: Proceedings of the Third Annual Symposium about Language and Society , Austin (Texas Linguistic Forum 36), pp. 225—47. Austin: University of Texas, Department of Linguistics.
  • Luebs, M.A. (1996) `Frozen Speech: The Rhetoric of Transcription', unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Michigan .
  • Macaulay, R.K.S. (1991) `" Coz It Izny Spelt When They Say It": Displaying Dialect in Writing ', American Speech 66(3): 280—91.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • MacLean, L.M., Meyer, M. and Estable, A. (2004) ` Improving Accuracy of Transcripts in Qualitative Research ', Qualitative Health Research 14(1): 113—23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Michaels, S. (1983) ` Influences on Children's Narratives', Quarterly Newsletter of Comparative Human Cognition 5(2): 30—4.
  • Miethaner, U. (2000) ` Orthographic Transcriptions of Non-standard Varieties: The Case of Earlier African-American English ', Journal of Sociolinguistics 4(4): 534—60.[CrossRef]
  • Moerman, M. (1988) Talking Culture: Ethnography and Conversation Analysis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Moerman, M. (1996) ` The Field of Analyzing Foreign Language Conversations', Journal of Pragmatics 26(2): 147—58.[CrossRef]
  • Mondada, L. (2002) ` Pratiques de transcription et effets de catégorisation ', Cahiers de praxématique 39: 45—75.
  • Norris, S. (2002) ` The Implication of Visual Research for Discourse Analysis: Transcription beyond Language', Visual Communication 1(1): 97—121.
  • Ochs, E. (1979) `Transcription as Theory', in E. Ochs and B.B. Schieffelin (eds) Developmental Pragmatics, pp. 43—72. New York: Academic Press.
  • O'Connell, D.C. and Kowal, S. (1990) ` Some Sources of Error in the Transcription of Real Time in Spoken Discourse', Georgetown Journal of Languages and Linguistics 1(4): 453—66.
  • O'Connell, D.C. and Kowal, S. (2000) ` Are Transcripts Reproducible? ', Pragmatics 10(2): 247—69.
  • Parker, R.D. (1997) ` Text, Lines, and Videotape: The Ideology of Genre and the Transcription of Traditional Native American Oral Narrative as Poetry ', Arizona Quarterly 53(3): 141—69.
  • Patterson, B.R., Neupauer, N.C., Burant, P.A., Koehn, S.C. and Reed, A.T. (1996) ` A Preliminary Examination of Conversation Analytic Techniques: Rates of Inter-transcriber Reliability ', Western Journal of Communication 60(1): 76—91.[Web of Science]
  • Pitt, M.A., Johnson, K., Hume, E., Kiesling, S. and Raymond, W. (2005) ` The Buckeye Corpus of Conversational Speech: Labeling Conventions and a Test of Transcriber Reliability', Speech Communication 45: 89—95.
  • Powers, W.R. (2005) Transcription Techniques for the Spoken Word. Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.
  • Preston, D.R. (1982) ` 'Ritin' fowklower daun 'rong: Folklorists' Failures in Phonology ', Journal of American Folklore 95(377): 304—26.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Preston, D.R. (1985) ` The Li'l Abner Syndrome: Written Representations of Speech ', American Speech 60(4): 328—36.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Psathas, G. and Anderson, T. (1990) ` The "Practices" of Transcription in Conversation Analysis ', Semiotica 78(1/2): 75—99.[Web of Science]
  • Pye, C., Wilcox, K.A. and Siren, K.A. (1988) ` Refining Transcriptions: The Significance of Transcriber "Errors "', Journal of Child Language 15(1): 17—37.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Roberts, F. and Robinson, J.D. (2004) ` Interobserver Agreement on First-stage Conversation Analytic Transcription ', Human Communication Research 30(3): 376—410.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Schegloff, E.A. (1996) `Turn Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and Interaction', in E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff and S.A. Thompson (eds) Interaction and Grammar, pp. 52—133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schenkein, J. (ed.) (1978) Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction. New York: Academic Press.
  • Schilling-Estes, N. (2004) ` Constructing Ethnicity in Interaction ', Journal of Sociolinguistics 8(2): 163—95.[Web of Science]
  • Selting, M., Auer, P., Barden, B., Bergmann, J., Couper-Kuhlen, E., Günthner, S., Meier, C., Quasthoff, U., Schlobinski, P. and Uhmann, S. (1998) `Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem (GAT)' [A Transcription System for Conversation Analysis] , Linguistische Berichte 173(1998): 91—122.
  • Sherzer, J. (1994) `Transcription, Representation, and Translation: Repetition and Performance in Kuna Discourse', in B. Johnstone (ed.) Repetition in Discourse: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Vol. 1, pp. 37—52. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Silverstein, M. and Urban, G. (eds) (1996) Natural Histories of Discourse. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Slembrouck, S. (1999) ` Translation, Direct Quotations and Decontextualisation ', Perspectives: Studies in Translatology 7(1): 81—108.[Web of Science]
  • Tedlock, D. (1990) ` From Voice and Ear to Hand and Eye ', Journal of American Folklore 103(408): 133—56.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • ten Have, P. (2002) ` Reflections on Transcription ', Cahiers de praxématique 39: 21—43.
  • Tilley, S.A. (2003) `" Challenging" Research Practices: Turning a Critical Lens on the Work of Transcription ', Qualitative Inquiry 9(5): 750—73.[Abstract]
  • Urban, G. (1996) `Entextualization, Replication, and Power', in M. Silverstein and G. Urban (eds) Natural Histories of Discourse, pp. 21—44. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Van Borsel, J.J. (1989) ` The Reliability of Phonetic Transcription: A Practical Note ', Child Language Teaching and Therapy 5(3): 327—33.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Walker, A.G. (1990) `Language at Work in the Law: The Customs, Conventions, and Appellate Consequences of Court Reporting', in J.N. Levi and A. Graffam Walker (eds) Language in the Judicial Process, pp. 203—46. New York: Plenum.
  • West, C. (1996) ` Ethnography and Orthography: A (Modest) Methodological Proposal ', Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 25(3): 327—52.[Abstract]

Discourse Studies, Vol. 9, No. 6, 784-808 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1461445607082580
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bucholtz, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?