Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Discourse Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fratila, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sionis, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Activating memories in interviews: an instance of collaborative discourse construction

Andreea Fratila

UNIVERSITY OF NANTES, FRANCE

Claude Sionis

UNIVERSITY OF LIMOGES AND UNIVERSITY OF NANTES, FRANCE

The article attempts to account for some conversational strategies for the thematic construction of discourse in a 30,000 word corpus of contemporary oral French. The sub-genre studied is that of the ‘memory-activation interview’, a speech situation, or ‘activity-type’ (Levinson, 1992) in which dialogues and meaning are co-constructed with the purpose of reviving memories. The general analytical framework is that of ‘interactional sociolinguistics’ as defined by Schiffrin (1998), in which the more specific aspects of ratification, legitimization and modes of contribution are redefined and diversified. Also central in the memory-activation process is the interviewer%'s role which, although not of a therapeutical nature (the interviewees suffer no particular memory impairments) is shown as being fully involved both at macro- (organizational) and micro- (interlocutive and turn-taking) levels. The article also tries to widen the range of the currently available tools for the analysis of speech seen as a thematic–rhematic process through the alternation of speech turns. The notion of thematic-discursive perimeter is introduced to account for thematic consistency.

Key Words: co-construction of meaning • co-operation • dialogism • ratification • rhematic • topic

Discourse Studies, Vol. 8, No. 3, 369-399 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1461445606061880
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?