This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Ford, C. E. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Contingency and Units in Interaction

University of Wisconsin- Madison

Starting with Houtkoop and Mazeland’s (1985) study of discourse units, and touching upon recent studies aimed at detailing unit projection in interaction, this article argues that the drive toward abstract and discrete models for units and unit projection is potentially misleading. While it has been established that to engage in talk-in-interaction, as it unfolds in real time, participants rely on projectable units (Sacks et al., 1974, 1978), research aimed at defining units unintentionally backgrounds the contingency inherent in interaction. A central function of language for collaborative action is the management of simultaneously unfolding facets of action, sound production, gesture, and grammar – produced by multiple participants. This article draws upon classic and current data analyses foregrounding linguistic/interactional practices designed to manage local contingencies. It is argued that attention to participants’ regular methods for managing and exploiting contingencies be incorporated from the outset in our descriptions of language and the nature of unit building in interaction.

Key Words: conversation analysis • discourse unit • projectability • transitionrelevance places • turn-constructional unit

Discourse Studies, Vol. 6, No. 1, 27-52 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1461445604039438


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Morita Highlighted moves within an action: segmented talk in Japanese conversation Discourse Studies, August 1, 2008; 10(4): 517 - 541. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Mondada Participants' online analysis and multimodal practices: projecting the end of the turn and the closing of the sequence Discourse Studies, February 1, 2006; 8(1): 117 - 129. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. A. Thompson and E. Couper-Kuhlen The clause as a locus of grammar and interaction Discourse Studies, October 1, 2005; 7(4-5): 481 - 505. [Abstract] [PDF]