Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Discourse Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Benwell, B.
Right arrow Articles by Stokoe, E. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Other

Constructing discussion tasks in university tutorials: shifting dynamics and identities

Bethan Benwell

UNIVERSITYOF STIRLING, b.m.benwell{at}stir.ac.uk

Elizabeth H. Stokoe

LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY, e.h.stokoe{at}lboro.ac.uk

This article examines task-setting sequences in university tutorial sessions. Classes from three higher education institutions were audio- and video-recorded. The resulting data, which included both tutor-led and peer group discussions, were transcribed and analysed using conversation analysis (CA). A number of themes emerged from our analysis. First, we found that the tutor's opening turns routinely followed a three-part sequence, the interpersonal and metadiscursive functions of which, we argue, are crucial components in the educative process. Second, we found that students displayed discursively their reluctance to engage in discussion activities and a resistance towards academic or intellectual identities. In contrast to findings from previous studies of tutor—student interaction, we found that interactional power was negotiated in complex and contradictory ways. This, in turn, may embody a range of complex social functions including attention to the `face' concerns of the group, category membership and orientation to broader cultural trends.

Key Words: K E YWORDS: academic culture • academic identity • conversation analysis (CA) • discussion • face • politeness • power • student resistance • university tutorials

Discourse Studies, Vol. 4, No. 4, 429-453 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/14614456020040040201


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Language and LiteratureHome page
K. Eriksson Barajas and K. Aronsson
Avid versus struggling readers: co-construed pupil identities in school booktalk
Language and Literature, August 1, 2009; 18(3): 281 - 299.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Discourse StudiesHome page
M. Horton-Salway, J. Montague, S. Wiggins, and S. Seymour-Smith
Mapping the components of the telephone conference: an analysis of tutorial talk at a distance learning institution
Discourse Studies, December 1, 2008; 10(6): 737 - 758.
[Abstract] [PDF]