Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Discourse Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by THORNBORROW, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Questions, Control and the Organization of Talk in Calls to a Radio Phone-In

JOANNA THORNBORROW

CARDIFF UNIVERSITY

This article examines the management of participation in calls to radio phone-in programmes. In the broadcast media, there are increasing occasions for interaction between `professionals' and lay members of the public, particularly within what have come to be known generically as public participation programmes (talk shows, phone-in programmes and the like). People call in to phone-in programmes for various reasons; to give opinions, to get advice, and often to ask questions. In the particular phone-ins analysed here, callers are invited to put questions to leading politicians of the day about their election policies. In many institutional contexts for talk (e.g.courtrooms, classrooms, political interviews) the role of questioner has been found to be a more powerful interactional position than the role of answerer. Through an analysis of the organization of the phone-in calls, this article argues that the potentially powerful discourse role of questioner is interactionally `defused' through the participatory framework of the call. The author shows how the mediated interactional structure of these calls limits the range of possible actions available to callers in their institutional position as questioners, and thus produces constraints on what callers can actually achieve in this particular context for institutional talk.

Key Words: control • discourse • institutional interaction • participation frameworks • public participation • questions • radio phone-in

Discourse Studies, Vol. 3, No. 1, 119-143 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/1461445601003001006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DISCOURSE & COMMUNICATIONHome page
S. Hood and G. Forey
The interpersonal dynamics of call-centre interactions: co-constructing the rise and fall of emotion
Discourse & Communication, November 1, 2008; 2(4): 389 - 409.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Media Culture SocietyHome page
K. Ross
Political talk radio and democratic participation: caller perspectives on Election Call
Media Culture Society, November 1, 2004; 26(6): 785 - 801.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Discourse SocietyHome page
R. Fitzgerald and W. Housley
Identity, categorization and sequential organization: the sequential and categorial flow of identity in a radio phone-in
Discourse Society, September 1, 2002; 13(5): 579 - 602.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Discourse StudiesHome page
J. Thornborrow and R. Fitzgerald
From problematic object to routine `add-on': dealing with e-mails in radio phone-ins
Discourse Studies, April 1, 2002; 4(2): 201 - 223.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Discourse StudiesHome page
J. THORNBORROW
Authenticating Talk: Building Public Identities in Audience Participation Broadcasting
Discourse Studies, November 1, 2001; 3(4): 459 - 479.
[Abstract] [PDF]