Discourse Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by TRACY, K.
Right arrow Articles by ANDERSON, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Discourse Studies, Vol. 1, No. 2, 201-225 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/1461445699001002004

Relational Positioning Strategies in Police Calls: A Dilemma

KAREN TRACY

UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO

DONALD L. ANDERSON

UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO

When citizens call the police to report a problem with (or caused by) another, they need to not only characterize the problematic action/event, but they must position themselves in relation to the complained-about person. This conversational work of positioning self, and describing the other's actions, is delicate business when the complained-about person is connected to the caller. Different constructions of the other and the problem affect whether callers get the help they are seeking. At the same time, alternate constructions offer different pictures of the other's blameworthiness and self's contribution to the problem. In this study we analyze citizen calls to the police in which callers have a dilemma: they have a problem with another that they want remedied but the problem occurs in a situation where involving the police is regarded as unreasonable. Past research on calls to the police, and studies about how people position their own and others' actions in sensitive situations are described. Then the materials (the police calls) and interpretive method are explained. The heart of the article is a description of four relational positioning strategies. Strategies include: (a) generic reference terms; (b) `friend' to imply a non-sexual relationship; (c) ex-prefaces; and (d) agent-less problems. The conclusion considers where else the dilemma will be found and highlights distinctive features of the rhetorical discursive perspective developed in the article.

Key Words: conversational strategies • dilemma • discourse • police calls • relational positioning


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Discourse SocietyHome page
R. R. Agne
Reframing practices in moral conflict: interaction problems in the negotiation standoff at Waco
Discourse Society, September 1, 2007; 18(5): 549 - 578.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
Y. Neuman and M. Levi
Blood And Chocolate: A Rhetorical Approach to Fear Appeal
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, March 1, 2003; 22(1): 29 - 46.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Discourse StudiesHome page
R. R. AGNE and K. TRACY
`Bible Babble': Naming the Interactional Trouble at Waco
Discourse Studies, August 1, 2001; 3(3): 269 - 294.
[Abstract] [PDF]